Comments on: Looking for ASP.NET MVC Frameworks… http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/ Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:31:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Flominator http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-2453 Flominator Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:10:38 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-2453 ... and if you want to TDD views, try <a href="http://selenium-rc.seleniumhq.org/" rel="nofollow">Selenium RC<a>. … and if you want to TDD views, try Selenium RC.

]]> By: Microsoft to release MVC framework with Visual Studio 2008 - Peter Krantz http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-2051 Microsoft to release MVC framework with Visual Studio 2008 - Peter Krantz Thu, 11 Oct 2007 19:08:24 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-2051 [...] someone hinted in the comments to my previous posts on ASP.NET MVC frameworks, Microsoft is apparently releasing a new MVC framework to make ASP.NET development simpler. [...] [...] someone hinted in the comments to my previous posts on ASP.NET MVC frameworks, Microsoft is apparently releasing a new MVC framework to make ASP.NET development simpler. [...]

]]> By: dotnet on Rails - MonoRail « maonet technotes http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-2044 dotnet on Rails - MonoRail « maonet technotes Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:44:43 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-2044 [...] Pro Spring, which covers DI (Dependency Injection)  and MVC on Java. I had the same feeling with peterkrantz,  yes, too much configuration works.  Rails is way better than that. How can Spring.net [...] [...] Pro Spring, which covers DI (Dependency Injection)  and MVC on Java. I had the same feeling with peterkrantz,  yes, too much configuration works.  Rails is way better than that. How can Spring.net [...]

]]> By: chris weber http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-2027 chris weber Sun, 09 Sep 2007 04:12:54 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-2027 http://www.promesh.net/ and/or coolstorage.net are doing it for me right now. http://www.promesh.net/ and/or coolstorage.net are doing it for me right now.

]]> By: When PHP makes sense - Peter Krantz http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-2026 When PHP makes sense - Peter Krantz Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:42:38 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-2026 [...] at creating the app in ASP.NET and make it run under Mono. Unfortunately I can’t find an MVC framework for ASP.NET that works the way I want. Ruby on Rails has really lowered the threshold of what I can put up with [...] [...] at creating the app in ASP.NET and make it run under Mono. Unfortunately I can’t find an MVC framework for ASP.NET that works the way I want. Ruby on Rails has really lowered the threshold of what I can put up with [...]

]]> By: Pete http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-2004 Pete Sun, 26 Aug 2007 20:19:00 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-2004 This looks very interesting. Hopefully Microsoft will have had a look at what what developers are looking for in an MVC framework. This looks very interesting. Hopefully Microsoft will have had a look at what what developers are looking for in an MVC framework.

]]> By: Josh http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-2003 Josh Sun, 26 Aug 2007 18:36:37 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-2003 <a href="http://codebetter.com/blogs/jeffrey.palermo/archive/2007/03/16/Big-News-_2D00_-MVC-framework-for-ASP.NET-in-the-works-_2D00_-level-300.aspx" rel="nofollow">MVC framework for ASP.NET in the works</a> MVC framework for ASP.NET in the works

]]> By: Josh http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-2002 Josh Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:20:01 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-2002 Fredrik, I have talked to a few MS employees who have confirmed the MVC framework for ASP.NET, but no real details. Said to look for beta in November. Fredrik,
I have talked to a few MS employees who have confirmed the MVC framework for ASP.NET, but no real details. Said to look for beta in November.

]]> By: Fredrik http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-1998 Fredrik Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:36:57 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-1998 I just read somewhere in blogs recently that Microsoft is almost ready with MVC framework and are about to announce somewhere in October. Can any one confirm this again. Microsoft has been quiet a lot about MVC framework and VBx ( The Dynamic Language ). IronRuby shall work on Net framework and shall fully support Ruby on Rails.... My question is which MVC pattern are they going to use. Mr. Scott Guthrie in one of his blogs comments said that MVC for asp.net will be independent of language. Hoping to get some fresh news about this. I just read somewhere in blogs recently that Microsoft is almost ready with MVC framework and are about to announce somewhere in October.

Can any one confirm this again.

Microsoft has been quiet a lot about MVC framework and VBx ( The Dynamic Language ).

IronRuby shall work on Net framework and shall fully support Ruby on Rails…. My question is which MVC pattern are they going to use.

Mr. Scott Guthrie in one of his blogs comments said that MVC for asp.net will be independent of language.

Hoping to get some fresh news about this.

]]> By: Ayende Rahien http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-1997 Ayende Rahien Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:56:18 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-1997 Peter, Active Record is usable outside of MR. In fact, there are zero dependencies between the two. Peter,
Active Record is usable outside of MR. In fact, there are zero dependencies between the two.

]]> By: Philippe http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-1996 Philippe Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:33:37 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-1996 I've used <a href="http://www.promesh.net" rel="nofollow">ProMesh.NET</a> for years (you'll figure out why :) ) A little background info can be found in <a href="http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/08/promesh" rel="nofollow">this InfoQ article</a> I’ve used ProMesh.NET for years (you’ll figure out why :) )

A little background info can be found in this InfoQ article

]]> By: Josh http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-1995 Josh Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:43:11 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-1995 I haven't seen that one yet. But out of the ones that had been listed in the blog posting, monorail I have found to be the least headache to enabled. I will at a look at this framework. Do you use currently? With success? I haven’t seen that one yet. But out of the ones that had been listed in the blog posting, monorail I have found to be the least headache to enabled. I will at a look at this framework. Do you use currently? With success?

]]> By: Philippe http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-1994 Philippe Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:15:29 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-1994 Why would MonoRail be the only choice? There's also <a href="http://www.promesh.net" rel="nofollow">ProMesh.NET</a>. I'm sure there are some other frameworks that do similar things. Why would MonoRail be the only choice?

There’s also ProMesh.NET. I’m sure there are some other frameworks that do similar things.

]]> By: Josh http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-1992 Josh Sun, 19 Aug 2007 07:58:26 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-1992 Monorail is really your only choice. But I have heard through the grapevine that Microsoft is working on producing a MVP/MVC framework for ASP.NET since the ROR framework is becoming popular. I heard this from a MS employee... so there could very well be some truth in this matter. Issues are IIS 6.0 which IIS 7.0 should take care of. I was told to keep an eye out in Oct/Nov for the release of a MS MVP/MVC pattern. <em>Enterprise Pattern?</em> Monorail is really your only choice. But I have heard through the grapevine that Microsoft is working on producing a MVP/MVC framework for ASP.NET since the ROR framework is becoming popular. I heard this from a MS employee… so there could very well be some truth in this matter. Issues are IIS 6.0 which IIS 7.0 should take care of. I was told to keep an eye out in Oct/Nov for the release of a MS MVP/MVC pattern. Enterprise Pattern?

]]> By: Ben http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-1991 Ben Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:29:21 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-1991 Monorail (along with the rest of the castle stack) is the only framework worth looking into right now. As for persistence, look at NHibernate alongside ActiveRecord. Take a look at <a href="http://www.ayende.com" rel="nofollow">Ayende's site</a> for some monorail screencasts and other useful monorail stuff. Monorail (along with the rest of the castle stack) is the only framework worth looking into right now. As for persistence, look at NHibernate alongside ActiveRecord.
Take a look at Ayende’s site for some monorail screencasts and other useful monorail stuff.

]]> By: hammett http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-1990 hammett Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:28:51 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/aspnet-mvc-frameworks/#comment-1990 Hello, check this http://using.castleproject.org/display/MR/TDDingControllers Hello, check this http://using.castleproject.org/display/MR/TDDingControllers

]]>