Comments on: A new version of the Ruby Accessibility Analysis Kit http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/ A blog about technology, visualization, music and unmanned vehicle experiments Sun, 06 Jul 2008 06:21:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Raj http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/#comment-2164 Raj Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:46:45 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/#comment-2164 Hi...i was trying to use "Raakt'..i have downloaded the Raakt 0.5gem and i have tried to use the same script to run which is posted on the page "http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/" ....but it is unable to find ..is ther any way i can monitor the webpage.... pls do mail me on my mail id .... Hi…i was trying to use “Raakt’..i have downloaded the Raakt 0.5gem and i have tried to use the same script to run which is posted on the page “http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/” ….but it is unable to find ..is ther any way i can monitor the webpage….

pls do mail me on my mail id ….

]]> By: Christophe Strobbe http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/#comment-2045 Christophe Strobbe Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:31:00 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/#comment-2045 Hi Peter, I assume you used UWEM 1.0? In the mean time, the WAB cluster has published UWEM 1.0 for review: http://www.wabcluster.org/uwem1_2/ Hi Peter,
I assume you used UWEM 1.0? In the mean time, the WAB cluster has published UWEM 1.0 for review: http://www.wabcluster.org/uwem1_2/

]]> By: Pete http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/#comment-1924 Pete Sun, 01 Apr 2007 11:09:27 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/#comment-1924 You were using the previous (0.4) version of raakt. That version relied on the RubyfulSoup parsing library. This apparently introduced some strange markup behaviour from time to time. The current version relies on Hpricot which seems to be much more stable. I just updated the online interface so you should be able to retest your page again. You were using the previous (0.4) version of raakt. That version relied on the RubyfulSoup parsing library. This apparently introduced some strange markup behaviour from time to time. The current version relies on Hpricot which seems to be much more stable.

I just updated the online interface so you should be able to retest your page again.

]]> By: Roland Crowl http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/#comment-1922 Roland Crowl Sun, 01 Apr 2007 04:47:28 +0000 http://www.peterkrantz.com/2007/raakt-in-watir/#comment-1922 I used the online RAAKT checker and noticed that the reported code checked looked like . A quick check of my own code showed that I had not included that strange 'meta=""' attribute. A further check of the code listing revealed the same effect with the and tags as well. There may be others; I didn't look beyond the first thirty or so lines. I, of course, cannot tell if the problem is in the parsing or the reporting, but something needs to be fixed. I used the online RAAKT checker and noticed that the reported code checked looked like . A quick check of my own code showed that I had not included that strange ‘meta=”"‘ attribute. A further check of the code listing revealed the same effect with the and tags as well. There may be others; I didn’t look beyond the first thirty or so lines. I, of course, cannot tell if the problem is in the parsing or the reporting, but something needs to be fixed.

]]>