<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Rails ever run on IronRuby?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterkrantz.com/2008/rails-on-ironruby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterkrantz.com/2008/rails-on-ironruby/</link>
	<description>A blog about technology, visualization, music and unmanned vehicle experiments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lam</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkrantz.com/2008/rails-on-ironruby/comment-page-1/#comment-2194</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 22:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkrantz.com/2008/rails-on-ironruby/#comment-2194</guid>
		<description>Rails *will* run on IronRuby. As will all other &#039;pure Ruby&#039; frameworks that don&#039;t use features we can&#039;t implement (today that&#039;s only call_cc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rails *will* run on IronRuby. As will all other &#8216;pure Ruby&#8217; frameworks that don&#8217;t use features we can&#8217;t implement (today that&#8217;s only call_cc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thibaut Barrère</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkrantz.com/2008/rails-on-ironruby/comment-page-1/#comment-2185</link>
		<dc:creator>Thibaut Barrère</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkrantz.com/2008/rails-on-ironruby/#comment-2185</guid>
		<description>As a guy who appreciate Ruby, Rails and DotNet as well, I&#039;ve followed Ruby on DotNet since RubyCLR. I really believe IronRuby is going to change the way people work with DotNet &lt;strong&gt;a lot&lt;/strong&gt;.

I also believe Rails will run on IronRuby, but more important we&#039;ll see new (web) frameworks in the spirit of Merb or Camping appears, and new testing tools as well.

2008 is going to be a great year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a guy who appreciate Ruby, Rails and DotNet as well, I&#8217;ve followed Ruby on DotNet since RubyCLR. I really believe IronRuby is going to change the way people work with DotNet <strong>a lot</strong>.</p>
<p>I also believe Rails will run on IronRuby, but more important we&#8217;ll see new (web) frameworks in the spirit of Merb or Camping appears, and new testing tools as well.</p>
<p>2008 is going to be a great year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkrantz.com/2008/rails-on-ironruby/comment-page-1/#comment-2184</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkrantz.com/2008/rails-on-ironruby/#comment-2184</guid>
		<description>Given that Rails runs on JRuby, I would think that Microsoft would be very interested in getting rails to run on .NET.  Of course, I could just be hoping, as I&#039;m hedging my bet on that being the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that Rails runs on JRuby, I would think that Microsoft would be very interested in getting rails to run on .NET.  Of course, I could just be hoping, as I&#8217;m hedging my bet on that being the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
